UTAH TECH UNIVERSITY'S STUDENT NEWS SOURCE | May 11, 2026

Campus protests address immigration enforcement, concerns over national issues

Sparked by the recent deaths of U.S. citizens and anti-ICE protests around the country, members of the Utah Tech community held public demonstrations voicing their views on national issues Jan. 27-29.

“When our government starts killing people, we need to do something just to let people know we think it’s not right,” Matt Smith-Lahrman, professor of sociology, said. “This is a kind of way to empower people, make people come together and see that other people think like us. This lets the powers be know that we’re angry.”

The three-day protests, organized in collaboration with the American Federation of Teachers, were planned, advertised and executed in one night, said Elizabeth Libero, an assistant professor of history and social sciences.

“Faculty members of the union decided to come to express our concern about excesses and lack of due process, lack of law and current events around our country,” Libero said. “We’re concerned about protecting the rights of immigrants and everyone in this country who is at risk. So, that includes people who aren’t immigrants, immigrants with legal status, immigrants who don’t have legal status.”

Although started by union members of the AFT, students and community members were welcome to join as well. The protest was advertised on Reddit and Facebook, though members of the community have posted photos and videos elsewhere.

“[The protest] has been peaceful,” said protest attendee Maive Bradshaw, a freshman general studies major from St. George. “I think most people come by and see that we’re just holding signs and we’re willing to talk.”

Poster boards, markers and pre-made posters were available to anyone who wanted to take part.

“I think resistance in times like these is an American tradition,” John Jones, a psychology professor and department chair, said. “We [Americans] stand up for each other, and whether they’re [people being stood up for] undocumented or U.S. citizens, we believe in community and taking care of each other.”

During the demonstrations, several individuals took up conversation with the protesters. While protesters expressed their views, they remained open to discussion throughout the demonstration. Participants took photos and connected with others who shared similar views.

“Believe your own eyes. Look at what’s happening to your fellow citizens and other parts of the country,” Jones said, offering this message to anyone uncertain about their cause. “Please, be as brave as you can and stand up. Speak out, at the very least. Just speak out. The more others hear from you, the more momentum we build. It might not seem like a big deal, but just letting your voice be heard can be really powerful.”

Institute of Politics discussion explores legal, global implications of Venezuela conflict

Utah Tech University’s Institute of Politics held a discussion and dialogue on Venezuela and foreign affairs in the Gardner Student Center building Jan. 27.

This event was the Institute of Politics’ first event this semester. The event consisted of three guests on the discussion panel.

The guests talked about the current conflict between Venezuela and the United States, and also the legal aspect that goes into foreign affairs. The IOP holds discussions and dialogue to engage in civilized discussions about political events, and for students to learn more about how to discuss political topics in a productive conversation.

The conflict

On Jan. 3, 2026, the president of Venezuela, Nicolás Maduro, was arrested by United States forces. Maduro is facing charges of drug trafficking and weapons offenses.

The raid of the arrest left many Venezuelans and Cuban personnel dead.

There is a debate over whether the United States invaded Venezuela to arrest Maduro or if the arrest was justified.

Some argue the U.S. president doesn’t have the power to declare war, and the Constitution gives that power to Congress instead.

Others argue that the invasion wasn’t a deliberate war declaration.

The discussion

The guests for this event consisted of: Tim Anderson, Shadman Bashir and Geoff Allen.

Tim Anderson is a lawyer for the law firm Kirton McConkie. Anderson brought up the legal justification regarding the conflict of the arrest.

“There’s no posse rule outside of the United States,” Anderson said. “Meaning, the military can also be involved in law enforcement. If he had been in Hong Kong or Cairo, or [anywhere] else, they could have done the same thing.”

Anderson was interactive with the audience, asking the crowd to raise their hands if they had an interest in law, encouraging them to get involved with current issues.

“We are right now in a world that is prepositioning itself for world conflict on a larger scale,” Anderson said. “And if you don’t understand that, then you’re very naive.”

Shadman Bashir, executive director of the Office of International Programs on campus, brought a global perspective into the debate.

“International law is different,” Bashir said. “What that means is two countries, two regions, two international entities can meet and say, ‘Hey, this is an agreement, and this is how we’re going to respect each other’s regulations.'”

Geoff Allen is a history and political science professor on campus. Allen brought up the power the president has over foreign affairs and how legal documents outline responsibilities.

“U.S. law doesn’t clearly, under Article II, apply in non-U.S. territories,” Allen said. “That would be a recipe for government overreach in a way that I think most of us would find objectionable.”

Article II of the Constitution outlines the president’s roles, powers and responsibilities.

Student involvement

After the guests had their discussion, the floor was opened to people who attended the event to ask questions.

People who attended the event were encouraged to bring up topics that weren’t already discussed or ask the guests to go more in-depth.

The questions that were asked involved the effects of the economies, the alliances with other countries and how global populations would be affected.

The guest speakers answered each question with their own perspectives and knowledge.

“We are political scientists on how we deal with life,” Anderson said. “How we deal with our families, how we deal with our communities.”

America First Performing Arts Center set to open fall 2026 after major renovation

Two years after the start of remodeling the America First Performing Arts Center, previously known as the Cox Performing Arts Center, the Utah Tech University community can expect to see a reopening in the 2026 fall semester.

The America First Performing Arts Center is in the final stages of renovation. The building, once completed, will have:

  • An additional 10 thousand square feet of space
  • A second floor rehearsal space and banquet hall
  • Improved acoustics and new technology for enhanced performances
  • Increased seating, including new layout with center aisles
  • Bigger lobby space

The certification of occupancy of the building will be March 27, said Jon Gibb, director of facilities planning and construction. Gibb has been managing the remodel of the center. Departments will be able to move material into the center, allowing for performances to be in the fall.

Over the past two years, the Utah Tech art department has been performing in the Dolores Eccles Fine Arts Center. Once the remodel is complete, the different sections of the art department will be able to have more available space to perform again.

This will allow for more connection between faculty and staff, along with everything needed being in one place.

“It’s going to be a very elegant space that demands respect for the arts,” Gibb said.

Aside from the main added renovations, there will be added outdoor and indoor seating for before and after performances.

One main element that will enhance the center is improved acoustics and new technology.

Before the remodel, Jeff Jarvis, dean for the College of the Arts, said the auditorium felt “dead.” An acoustician was hired on-site to ensure that the space’s new acoustics would align with the performers and the audience. It has been enhanced to both electronic and acoustic instruments and sounds.

Jarvis explained that the newly added advancements are a space for students and performers to connect more with the audience. With the new additions, the performers will be more in tune with the sound of the art created.

“It’s warmer and richer, and it’s a whole different feeling,” Jarvis said.

The center will hold more than just student performances. Events like celebrity concerts, orchestras and other live performances will be held at the center. Jarvis said when the community comes to Utah Tech, they are supporting both the university and the culture that is built.

“Anytime you can get people who live here to come onto campus, you help [build] relationships,” Jarvis said.

Christy De La Cruz, a senior theater major from Las Vegas, has been attending Utah Tech since before the renovation. Though there have been challenges with every art section being in the Eccles for two years, she is excited to perform in the new center.

De La Cruz said: “I’m relieved in a sense that we have a space [to perform]. We are on campus and a part of something.”

Though there is no official reopening date for the America First Performing Arts Center, the Utah Tech community can anticipate performances to happen in the upcoming fall semester.

“Now you get a space that invites people. [This space] calls to them, ‘Come visit, come watch, come participate in the arts.’ That is what is going to draw people in.” Jarvis said.

OPINION | Why my love for One Direction didn’t end in 2016

One Direction stole my heart in 2010. As a “Directioner,” I became a die-hard fan. But one thing still remains: How are we only “Half a Heart” without them? 

One Direction was formed on the British television show “X-Factor” in 2010. The band’s members were:

The group set records with its debut album in 2011, an outcome few predicted.

One Direction helped reshape pop culture with an authentic image. They did not wear matching outfits or perform choreographed routines; they were just themselves. That is what captured the fans — they were cute, funny guys and people loved them. 

The band went on hiatus in 2016, though the boys remained active as solo artists. This year has been the most active year for almost each member since they were together in a band. Malik is performing a seven-show residency in Las Vegas. Horan has teased new music. Styles is scheduled to release an album March 6 and will go on tour. Tomlinson released a new album Jan. 23 and will start a world tour soon. Nostalgia for the mid-2010s has resurfaced online, and renewed attention on One Direction has increased that sentiment among fans.

Nostalgia 

One Direction is a staple of our generation’s childhood. We grew up seeing them on merchandise in stores such as Claire’s and having themed birthday parties. The band was active during the rise of social media. Through platforms like Twitter, now known as X, and Instagram, the group created a sense of friendship by interacting with fans.

For a fan like me, who was 6 years old when the band was formed and had no business being on social media, I found that connection through their music videos. As a child, I used to pretend they were singing to me through the screen. It felt real. As delusional as I was, it was real for me. They had a fun, goofy vibe that could be felt through their music, videos and interviews. I rode that dopamine feeling for years, and I still do.

In the 2013 documentary “One Direction: This Is Us,” a neuroscientist explains fans’ intense emotional responses as a result of dopamine release in the brain. That response creates feelings of happiness and emotional reward, which can become associated with the band’s music. For me, listening to One Direction triggers memories tied to my childhood and a sense of freedom.

Parasocial 

The perceived closeness fostered through music and social media can lead to parasocial relationships. A parasocial relationship is a one-sided connection in which an individual feels personally connected to a public figure who does not know them.

One Direction is not unique in inspiring parasocial relationships among fans. Many music artists and fan bases experience similar situations.

The rise of social media in the early 2010s amplified these connections. Fans were able to interact directly with the band and watch them post personal photos, making it no different than when a friend would post. It gives you the idea that you are friends with them, sharing personal photos. 

As much as I like to be in denial about my parasocial relationship with the band, I have fallen victim to a mild relationship. I was in shock over Payne’s death. I made a TikTok immediately after it happened. I still can’t process that he is gone. I recently watched their documentary, and I cried because it made me realize I will never get to see them as a band again. It felt like seeing a friend you no longer talk to for the first time again.

I love One Direction. I will defend them like my life depends on it. I will talk about the boys to others as if they are my best friends and I know them personally. To this day, I am upset I never got to see them on tour.

During the band’s active years, fans organized fan projects. These included holding signs during concerts or creating visual displays using colored paper. A lot of the times the band would post about the projects and thank the fans, creating that personal connection.

Tweet from Horan in 2014.

Tomlinson and Horan are the most active members on X, as they respond to tweets and fans’ questions. Before Payne passed away, he regularly interacted with fans through livestreams, video chats and X. ​​

The band created a culture where fans felt seen through their music. Fans also got to see their personal lives through the documentary and see how we changed their lives. 

Parasocial relationships should be studied more; they are something that can’t be controlled but can be recognized and contained. One Direction was more than a pop trend, but a defining part of a generation’s childhood. They are the story of our lives.

OPINION | 2016 wasn’t perfect, so why do we miss it so much?

I still remember 2016 vividly. From listening to “24K Magic” on the bus to discovering who the Kardashians are, the year played a pivotal role in introducing 11-year-old me to pop culture. 

The nostalgia the internet and I feel for 2016 is very real. TikTok and Instagram are flooded with filtered photos yearning for simpler times. Photos of Coachella and the infamous army green jacket that my best friend owned are everywhere. 

Social media users, including myself, are romanticizing an era that wasn’t all that eventful to begin with. But the aesthetic captures a sense of nostalgia, drawing people into the throwback trend and hashtags reminiscent of the King Kylie era.

But the year wasn’t as romantic as it seemed. For myself, it started with a bout of Bell’s palsy followed by illness and an endless loop of “Sorry” by Justin Bieber being played on the radio. 

Others were experiencing sorrow from terrorist attacks happening around the country, the outcome of the 2016 election, or the outbreak of the Zika virus. But these moments are usually not taken into account when reminiscing on our memories of a decade ago.

Instead, people remember Snapchat filters and the famous mannequin challenge. People long to bring back silly internet trends and light-hearted interactions. So if we’re bringing the trends back, which ones deserve to stay and which deserve to go?

Trends that are IN

This is a hot take, but let’s bring back skinny jeans. I know, I know, I love straight and wide leg jeans just as much as the next person, but I rocked skinny jeans in 2016. I would love to see them become more popular without the death of loose silhouettes.

Let’s also bring back casual social media posting. People are often so focused on curating a perfect aesthetic that works with the algorithm. But my favorite people are the ones who post a picture of their brunch with their mom in the morning, and a picture of their dog in the afternoon. I want to see people posting without the fear of judgment from their peers.

One more thing I want to see come back is YouTube culture. People used to post such good videos. They were full of exciting stories, subpar editing and goofy personalities. People still post, but it’s just not the same. I loved a crazy episode of Good Mythical Morning or a vlog from Brooklyn and Bailey. People post curated videos now instead of authentic videos that show the chaos and cringiness of life.

Trends that are OUT

Black plastic chokers do not need to have a resurgence this year. I’m down for a little choker moment, but the black plastic ones are not it. They remind me of something a sixth grader would wear. They can stay in 2016.

Another thing that has had its time is super matte glam every day makeup. It was a moment, it was a statement, it is a relic. Dry foundation and highlighter blindness don’t need to make their way back into the beauty scene after dewy skin, extra blush and natural brows have made an appearance in modern makeup.

Another trend that can stay in 2016 is Snapchat filters. The glowing flower crown and the dog sticking out its tongue were so fun 10 years ago, but they’re outdated now. Filters are not the move anymore. I want to see you in your post, not the stars flying around your head.

Why the nostalgia?

The real question is, why are we so nostalgic for only a decade ago? I don’t recall people reminiscing about 2006 when I was in sixth grade. In fact, I remember it being the opposite.

People hated low-rise jeans, sweat suits and music that felt too old. But now, people yearn to go back — because people miss simpler times. 2016 wasn’t necessarily simple. However, most people were younger and had fewer burdens on their shoulders.

My biggest worry was whether or not I could get my spelling homework and Studies Weekly turned in by Friday morning, or if my cousin could hang out with me that night. I wasn’t worried about getting all my work hours in each week or if my credit card was paid off. I was more concerned with how my skinny jeans weren’t skinny enough.

There wasn’t the constant switch-up of trends and content in the media. Many weren’t paying bills yet, and their only worry was if their eyeliner was straight. People had money to party or buy things that weren’t necessities. Social media wasn’t packed full of political content and world news.

2016 is back because people want to feel a sense of security that can only come from the past, and knowing that we will overcome our trials. And while the trends are fun, they aren’t the only thing people reminisce on.

Utah Tech ceramics department showcase

Utah Tech is hosting its annual ceramics showcase until Jan. 30 at the North Commons Building. VIdeo reporter Zach Conrad interviews professor of ceramics Shane Christensen and student Jon Sanders about the exhibit and their passion for the medium.

Utah Tech uses Policy R516 to increase transparency around student fees

Utah Tech University aims to remain transparent with students through the Utah System of Higher Education policy R516. With the policy put in place, students have the opportunity to know what student fee money is going toward.

R516 states, “Institutions must identify the specific purpose for which revenue generated from a general student fee will be used.” Student fees cannot be used for academic or educational purposes, as under the policy, universities are required to take from tuition for any reason that isn’t focused solely on students.

R516 requires institutions like Utah Tech to state the specific purpose behind the usage of general student fees.

Under the policy, institutions are able to request fees be used on student-approved facility construction, student-approved facility operation and student activities, programs and services. The policy also states that any changes in student fees must be posted to the university’s website.

Along with transparency, R516 states that student voices must be involved in student fee decisions. Utah Tech approaches this demand by hosting the Student Fee Advisory Board.

“There’s a process for selecting students for the fee board,” said Luke Kerouac, executive director of student engagement and leadership. “It’s the student body president and vice president of the student council. Then there’s students at large. But who decides that is essentially every fee program manager. If you receive a student fee, you’re a fee program manager.” 

The Student Fee Advisory Board decides whether student fees are increased, decreased or cut entirely. 

Kerouac explained that every spring semester, Utah Tech advertises a meeting mandated by the Utah System of Higher Education called Truth in Tuition.

The meeting includes an appearance from the administrator over tuition, with an explanation of what the plan is for distribution of tuition money, what it is funding and how it’s split up. 

During the Truth in Tuition meeting, the student body president or another member of the fee board will explain where student fees are being moved, any future plans and any changes to the current distribution of fees.

Kerouac said that events like these offer students opportunities to learn about student fee money and where it’s utilized.

“I just really want to encourage students to come [to Truth in Tuition],” said Shellsea Ramirez, Utah Tech Student Association student body president, and a senior individualized studies major from St. George. “If students ever have any feedback, obviously I want to hear some of that so I can make sure to advocate for students in the ways that I can.”

Ismael Medina, a sophomore business administration major from St. George, said: “I’m not entirely sure where the student fees go. I would assume fees for classes.”

Kerouac pointed to the tuition and fees page on the university website for more insight into where fees currently go.

“Go on to the tuition and fees website at the university, and you can see all of the different fees, and they have the names associated with them of what fees on our campus are used for,” Kerouac said.

OPINION | Why driving in St. George has become a serious safety crisis

St. George is by far the worst place I’ve ever had the misfortune of driving in. Every time I buckle up, I wonder if today is the day I get the opportunity to be part of an absolutely real and terrifying statistic.

Growing up in St. George, I’ve seen a lot of changes, especially a huge population increase. Since 2005, the population has more than doubled, with major migration coming within the last few years.

St. George has been one of the fastest growing metro areas in the country, and the city was not prepared. Utah consistently ranks high in worst driver polls, Utah being ranked third place for worst drivers in the nation.

St. George plays its role in contributing to that third-place ranking, which I would mostly attribute to a local population that wasn’t prepared for the mass migration of out-of-state drivers.

In 2024, the St. George Police Department reported over 2,000 accidents resulting in nine fatalities. Although data isn’t yet available for 2025, it’s estimated that we’re seeing a significant increase in accident fatality rates from 2024 to 2025.

Things have gotten so bad that the St. George Police Department has started posting Traffic Tuesdays and Thursdays on their Instagram page, where they inform drivers about basic traffic laws.

Snowbirds

Poor driving in the city can be attributed to a lot of things, a major one being an older population. Due to the moderate winter weather in St. George, elderly residents, known as snowbirds, will live here for at least half the year. 

Driving at an older age brings natural impairments, such as slower reaction time, worsened eyesight and stiffened joints and muscles. Those impairments, paired with a rapidly growing population, are a recipe for disaster.

Texting while driving

Outside of the older residents, distracted driving is just as big an issue. Every time I drive down Bluff Street, it seems like the person next to me is always on their phone.

Studies show that distracted driving is the No. 1 cause of automobile accidents, even higher than driving under the influence or speeding. Thousands of deaths in the United States can be attributed to distracted driving, and it’s a shame that this issue hits so close to home.

Pairing the elderly, rapidly growing populations and distracted driving with a city that’s trying to rebuild an accommodating infrastructure is always going to lead to a hazardous environment. 

Many of the accidents you hear about around town are caused by people misjudging left-hand turns at yellow lights. With the amount of traffic we see, more lights should be forced left turns, especially off of major roads like Bluff and River Road.

Unreliable public transportation

Improved public transportation to combat the amount of traffic on the road would be a major step in the right direction. Currently, the only public transportation offered in St. George is the Suntran, which offers seven unique in-town routes that run every 40 minutes, Monday through Saturday. 

Although the Suntran is an option, it isn’t a viable form of public transportation. With a stop only being visited every 40 minutes, it’s an unreliable resource for a lot of people. If the Suntran were able to run every 10 to 15 minutes, it would be a much more valuable resource to city residents.

After living in Ogden for a year, I experienced what reliable public transportation looks like after using the Ogden Express to get around every day. Even though Ogden is closer to the more heavily populated Salt Lake City metro area, traffic didn’t seem as bad, with individuals opting to use public transportation.

As dangerous as St. George driving is, all it takes is simple changes.

Improved infrastructure to eliminate those lethal left turns and improved public transportation to make it a more reliable option are an excellent start in making St. George a safer place.

Outside of the changes the city can make, the individual resident can implement changes to make St. George a safer place to drive. If everybody would put down the distractions, practice more patience and freshen up on basic road laws, we could combat the scary driving statistics we currently face.