UTAH TECH UNIVERSITY'S STUDENT NEWS SOURCE | October 05, 2025

OPINION | Google Docs vs. Microsoft Word depends on your needs

There’s been plenty of debate about whether to use Google Docs or Microsoft Word, but the debate should be less about which word processor to use and more about when to use each one.

Here’s a rundown of why I choose one over the other for certain purposes:

Formatting

If you have to do anything more than basic formatting, Microsoft Word should be your go-to.

Google Docs tends to mess up complex formatting when you switch to a different computer or convert your file format. Google Docs can’t even handle a consistent hanging indent on a works cited page when submitting to Canvas.

Google Docs always makes at least one of my citations format incorrectly, its header margins are off, and half the time my essays are up to half a page smaller than I think they are because of general page margin inconsistency. I’ve had points taken off for all those things at least once, which is why I’ve leaned more toward Microsoft Word in recent semesters. Microsoft Word even has ways to ensure your formatting remains as it’s intended.

Auto-save and edit history

The auto-save feature in Google Docs is a real lifesaver, whereas Microsoft Word has nearly killed me.

I once had my laptop die as I was about to submit an essay near the deadline, and OneDrive wasn’t able to save the document. I had to beg my professor for an extension, and she didn’t give those out lightly. I’m pretty sure she only gave me the extension because my normally prepared, grade-obsessed self was so pale she thought I’d die otherwise.

Additionally, Google Docs has the ability to look at the edit history of a document, which is especially helpful when something from an old draft is useful to the current draft. Microsoft Word has a version of this, but only for files saved in OneDrive or SharePoint in Microsoft 365, and it wasn’t as detailed as Google Docs when I tried it out. The track changes feature is about as close as it gets in Microsoft Word.

Internet reliance vs. offline editing

That said, Google Docs’ reliance on the internet can be frustrating, especially when poor weather or the increasing number of Zoom and online learners clogs your internet connection.

The struggle of your internet going out right as you’re in the middle of typing a sentence on a dark and stormy night is annoying enough to set anyone on edge, and it’s happened to me so. many. times.

I’m not cliché or melodramatic enough to use the phrase “dark and stormy night” in my creative writing assignments, but it would be nice if I could use one to inspire some writing prompts instead of worrying about whether or not Google Docs will cut out because of my internet connection’s sensitivity to bad weather.

The best Google Docs can do is provide a Chrome extension or offline document viewing, which you have to enable for each individual document, whereas Microsoft Word can be used offline pretty much any time.

Basically, unless your internet connection is consistent, Microsoft Word is the best word processor to use. At the very least, Microsoft Word should be your backup for this scenario.

Collaboration

In regard to collaboration, Google Docs is superior to Microsoft Word.

Google Docs is primed for real-time collaboration, and it’s easier to see who edited what in the color-coded edit history. Microsoft Word has a similar feature, but only in the subscription-based Microsoft 365 online Word app, which isn’t even a full version of the program.

The closest Microsoft Word comes to competing in a less niche way is sending documents with track changes, but that takes longer and feels clunkier. Google Docs just streamlines the process and makes things easier all around.

The only time I use Microsoft Word for collaboration is in my editing internship since that’s what my professor is most familiar with, or when other professors require it for class. Otherwise, all my collaborative essays and projects are done in Google Docs.

Familiarity

When it comes down to it, familiarity will probably be the deciding factor for anyone debating which word processor to use.

Despite being trained to use Microsoft Word at various times across the span of my education, I’m probably most familiar with Google Docs since Google products have been increasingly integrated into education over the years. Think about it, even our Dmails are just university-sponsored Gmail accounts, and the same was true of my K-12 email account.

Plus, Google products are mostly free, which makes Google Docs more easily accessible than alternatives like Microsoft Word, even with the access provided by Dixie State University.

The long and short of it is that both Google Docs and Microsoft Word are useful, just for specific things. Google Docs is for auto-saving, collaboration and basic word processing needs. Microsoft Word is for offline editing, formatting and more complex word processing needs.

Don’t go all in on one or the other. Use both for different scenarios.

‘Can you hear us now?’: DSU students’ protest affects Senate’s decision to hear bill

Senate officials said Feb. 24 that they will hear House Bill 273, Name Change Process for Dixie State University, after DSU students gathered at the Utah State Capitol to make their voices heard.

David Clark, chair of the DSU Board of Trustees, addressed students at Utah’s Capitol Hill, saying, “Once the bill is introduced, it goes to the rules committee, then to the appropriate standing committee, then finally to be debated on the Senate floor.”

Clark said he is highly optimistic about seeing the bill go through the Senate, but he is happy to see that students are involving themselves with the process.

“We’re going to get this bill heard in the Senate; we are working right now to try and figure out what that means,” said Utah Senate President Stuart Adams, R-Layton. “We are negotiating.”

Sen. Michael McKell, R-Spanish Fork, will be sponsoring the name change bill in the Senate.

“We got an overwhelming support from the House floor,” said bill sponsor Rep. Kelly Miles, R-South Ogden, who addressed the student crowd that rallied in front of the Utah State Capitol building the morning of Feb. 24 after rumors surfaced that senators did not intend to hear the bill. “That tells our senate colleagues that we’re serious about this and we’d like them to be.”

”It makes a big difference to my colleagues, I can promise you,” Miles said. “Let your senator know that we want to debate it on the Senate floor.”

Video by Stephanie Du Par.

Samuela Tupola, president of the Multicultural and Inclusion Student Association and a junior integrated studies major from Salt Lake City, expressed his concern over the initial rumors.

“It should go to a vote; trying to stall it goes against our values of our country,” Tupola said. “I love the university; … the university has made leaps from what they used to be. Changing the name will help to show that we’ve come a long way.”

Student Body President Penny Mills, a senior communication studies major from Orem, met with Adams to discuss the name change.

“I came here to make sure the Senate knew we wanted our voices heard,” Mills said. “The student voice is one that should be heard the most on H.B. 278.”

Abbigail Scherzinger, student body chief of staff and a junior nursing major from West Jordan, said: “What is a university for if not to impact students’ futures for the better? We are such a great university, and I think we have so much to offer, and we’re growing so much. If we do a name change, there will be more opportunities for students and allow us to receive more professors who are currently afraid of having the name Dixie on their resume.”

On the other hand, a portion of community members feel that the Dixie name is part of their heritage and had an opposing view to the students’ protest.

The Defending Southwestern Utah Heritage Coalition, a group that is in favor of Utah’s Dixie, sent a press release to St. George News stating:

“DSUHC considers this effort to be another desperate move on the part of the University leadership which is characteristically consistent with its past behavior on this matter. It is ill–conceived, not carefully thought out, and in our view blatantly offensive to the university community, to Utah’s Dixie as especially to tax payers and parents/grandparents, many of whom are paying tuition for their children to attend DSU. While we do not object in any respect students exercising their rights to protest, we do object to student fees, tuitions, legislative appropriations, donor funds or dollars from any university sources or accounts being used to fund a trip to lobby the legislature on one side of the issue. Students also should not be encouraged to leave classes and teachers should not be encouraged to excuse them.”

Regardless of whether or not people are for the name change, students rallied to stand up for the bill to be argued on the floor rather than go unheard.

“I think that [senators] don’t want to deal with this right now because they are afraid of cancel culture even though it’s an issue that has been going for a very long time, and I don’t think it’s cancel culture,” Scherzinger said.

She said the senators owe it to the community and students to hear the bill.

Clark said, “If there is anything you should take away from all this, [it’s that] you may not have an interest in politics, but politics certainly has an interest in you.”

OPINION | Leon Bridges brings new style to pop music

As the radio blares on, the realization hits me that all pop music sounds the same; however, one artist managed to break the mold. Leon Bridges, a 31-year-old from Fort Worth, Texas, and his band have revived the old school 1960s style of music into an album released in 2015, which revamped my spark in new music at the time.

Even though the album is over five years old, it is still one of the albums I listen to the most. The new “old” style, the lyrics and the passion Bridges sings with are what make this album unlike any others.

Black History Month is dedicated to recognizing the contributions Black artists have made in America. The album “Coming Home” by Bridges is a prime example.

“Coming Home,” Bridges’ first-ever album, was nominated for the Grammy Awards for Best R&B album, peaked at No. 5 on the Billboard Global 200 list, and sold 42,000 copies.

Bridges’ style of music is unlike others by taking instrumental techniques that were popular 60 years ago and transforming it into the music we listen to today with its own distinctive form. Bridges’ sound is unique because of the use of trumpets, trombones and percussions, which we rarely see today. Featuring a prominent drums, a bass guitar, and an excellent vocalist, Bridges and the local musicians he used make the album sound as if it was transformed from a different generation.

In almost all of the music videos, Bridges has a black and white filter over the film and sings with an old-school microphone. He is truly a one-of-a-kind artist in how he incorporates retro nostalgia in modern music.

“I don’t want much, I just want to be a better man, for my baby” is the way the song “Better Man” starts on the album. This perspective Bridges has reflects the attitude he portrays throughout the album: yearning and desiring to be with his lover once again.

This style of love Bridges sings with is far different than what we hear most of the time on the radio today. Today, most top songs are about superficial romance and hookups. Bridges sings more about life with his girl and how he wants to be with her. In the song “Coming Home,” he sings, “I want to be around, darling,” which is just about the opposite of what most hip-hop artists are portraying in their music.

One of Bridges’ first songs ever composed is titled “Lisa Sawyer,” named after his mother, and it talks about his mother’s conversion to religion, which defined his music style.

In Bridges’ song “River,” he sings, “In my darkness I remember / Momma’s words reoccur to me / ‘Surrender to the good Lord / and he’ll wipe your slate clean,'” which portrays his religious side and the value it has in his life, which also isn’t as common in the music world today.

“Coming Home” is an album that will reignite your desire and love of listening to music. As Black History Month comes to an end, this album and artist should make the Black community proud because of the way he portrays Black excellence.

The song “Coming Home,” which the album was named after, was the most viral track on Spotify in February 2015, so take a quick break from whatever you’re doing, put your headphones in, and check out this album unlike any other.

It’s OK to not know: DSU’s Major and Minor Exploration Fair helps students discover passions

College is a time for individuals to explore future career options and what they are passionate about. Choosing a major, minor, degree and career path seems like a stressful task for students, but Dixie State University’s Career Center and Academic Advisement Center are here to help.

DSU’s Career Center and Academic Advisement Center held their annual Major and Minor Exploration Fair Feb. 24, and students had the opportunity to connect with and learn about the majors and minors offered to them. The event is held each spring while students are preparing to choose the courses they would like to take in the upcoming fall semester.

“This event is a great opportunity for students to not only explore majors, but minors and certificates in all areas,” career coach Rochelle Blatter said.

DSU has 68 degrees and 44 minors for students to choose from, and it is always adding more. It is ideal that students find the major and minor that is the best fit for them so they are doing what they love at school and making an impact on their future.

“Students are more engaged in their college and academic experience if they have direction. Choosing your major and ultimately your career helps students feel more confident on their career path.”

Career coach Rochelle Blatter

Talking with an academic adviser or a career coach from the Career Center is one way students can start finding something they love and want to study at DSU.

Blatter said: “Career Services offers a variety of appointments and services to help students explore majors and careers; [this includes] a Career Exploration Extended Appointment, which includes self-reflection, strengths, interests, and personality and helps formulate an action plan to explore further.”

Academic advisers help students choose a major and minor to get started on the path to graduation, as this is vital for success in a future career. It is important to engage in both a minor and a major because employers will always look at students’ degrees to see what skills they bring to the table.

“The goal of a bachelor’s degree is to upscale yourself or bring a skill set to an employer,” said Shane Blocker, assistant director of career services.

Students are often confused about what a minor is and why it may be beneficial to their degree. A minor is equally as important as a major because it sets students apart from others by adding more experience, knowledge and expertise to their resumes. A minor can be something students are passionate about, or it can be a set of courses that go hand-in-hand with their major.

“A minor is an opportunity to study something you enjoy that you don’t have the time to do a full degree on,” said Katie Armstrong, director of college advisement.

Armstrong said when students choose to add a minor to their degree, they should be interested in the topic, understand what is expected, and ensure they have the time and motivation for more classes.

“We never want students to feel rushed or forced,” Armstrong said. “It is OK to be exploratory and to not know.”

Since it is essential for students to eventually choose a major and minor, it is important to explore all of the options at DSU. This is why students are required to take general education courses; it allows for students to scout out every opportunity and program at DSU.

“Students are more engaged in their college and academic experience if they have direction,” Blatter said. “Choosing your major and ultimately your career helps students feel more confident on their career path.”

‘Journalism Against the Odds’: Student Press Freedom Day recognizes student journalists

Student Press Freedom Day — also known as SPFD — is on Feb. 26 and celebrates the role student journalists fill while pointing out the challenges they face.

Hadar Harris, executive director of the Student Press Law Center, said the SPLC created SPFD in 2019 to elevate and amplify awareness of the challenges faced by student journalists and the great contributions they make.

Harris said student journalists do not get the credit or recognition they deserve. This is why SPFD was created, to bring light to the challenges and hardships that student journalists go through.

“Despite the important work they do, student journalists are often subject to censorship or prior review by school administrators who want to restrict publications of stories which would put the school in a bad light or cause controversy,” Harris said.

This year, the theme for SPFD is “Journalism Against the Odds” in acknowledgment of the news coverage students produced despite being faced with challenges.

“In addition to outright censorship, student journalists worked against odds that included prior review, lack of access to critical data, suppression of or discipline for unflattering or controversial photos or other news coverage, assault and harassment during public gatherings, budget cuts, and an abrupt shift to an all-virtual newsroom and all-online business model,” Harris said.

In 2020, students covered stories about outbreaks and improper quarantine measures on campuses. Beth Francesco, senior director of the National Press Club Journalism Institute, said SPFD is there to support students through those tricky spots.

“Amid the ongoing pandemic, students have limited access to information and to places where important decisions are made about campus closures, COVID rates, and preventative measures and housing.” Francesco said.

The struggles that student journalists face as time goes on can affect the universities they attend. The SPFD website states that student press has been attacked and abused, as well as unconstitutionally thwarted and disciplined for raising awareness, but students have fought back.

“A community without an independent news source is a news desert, which only benefits those in power, not masses,” said Kelly Glasscock, executive director of the Journalism Education Association.

Francesco said student journalists are some of the most hardworking individuals in their field — they are curious, innovative and untethered to conventional ways of gathering and reporting information.

“Students in each high school and university should have a voice,” Glasscock said. “Student media provides that voice and operates as a checks and balance system.”

Partners of the SPFD said as student journalists work against all odds to create and share their stories, countless factors continue to hold them back from getting all the information they can.

They aren’t the only ones to hold this opinion either; students want their voices to be heard.

Kristi Shields, the Dixie Sun News editor-in-chief and a junior communication studies major from Salt Lake City, said, “Personally, as a student journalist, I feel under-appreciated and less important than journalists who report on the local news, so this day is important to me because it reminds me that our hard work is being recognized; it’s not all for nothing and we are important to the campus population.”

Shields also said SPFD is a day to acknowledge what student journalists do and that “we are as important as journalists who work for city newspapers.”

By Olivia Ruud.

OPINION | House Bill 302 harmful to transgender student-athletes

A bill prohibiting transgender female athletes from competing in high school sports was voted on in the Utah House and passed 50-23, and it will now be voted on in the Utah Senate. This bill is damaging to transgender athletes in Utah.

The bill, House Bill 302, states that transgender female athletes should not be allowed to compete in female sports, and the reasoning behind it is that it would create an unequal playing field for female-at-birth student-athletes.

“When transgender athletes compete against women, women’s sports are no longer women’s sports; they become unisex athletic events,” Sen. Mike Lee, R-Utah, said in a statement. “This bill would protect the opportunity of girls throughout America to athletically compete against other girls.”

The logic in this reasoning is flawed. Transgender women are women and should be allowed to compete for female sports teams. No one is asking for unisex events, only for those who identify as male or female to play in their respective gendered sport.

Troy Williams with Equality Utah said in a report to Deseret News, “I don’t believe that the representative’s intent is to harm transgender students, but the impact most definitely will.”

I can’t speak for whether or not the intention was to harm transgender athletes, but as Williams said, the impact will harm transgender athletes regardless. This is just another thing on a long list, from bathroom policies to athletics participation, that has taken rights away from transgender people.

The NCAA has policies that allow transgender athletes to compete, and trying to overrule that decision does two things.

First, it eliminates the opportunity for transgender athletes to practice their sport in high school and potentially go to the collegiate level. Second, trying to overrule the NCAA looks foolish and will only further continue to damage the reputation Utah high schools and colleges have around the country.

2020 was a good year for women’s sports, especially with the success leagues like the National Women’s Soccer League had, and it’s time for LGBTQ+ people to have their moment. The acceptance of all races, sexualities and genders in sport is necessary, and they’ve been waiting long enough.

Utah has been on the wrong side of history on many issues surrounding the rights of LGBTQ+ people. Utah’s claim of “protecting the children” is overdone. There comes a point when “protecting the children” comes at the cost of hurting others, and we’ve reached that point.

The point of high school athletics is to be inclusive. You hear it before any game you go to in the state that the Utah High School Athletics Association wants a fair and equal playing field for any students who wish to participate, but then bills like this come up blatantly banning someone from participating.

This bill is damaging to not only transgender athletes, but the state of Utah as a whole. There is no need to protect females from other females. There are already very few transgender athletes looking to compete in high school athletics; why should the government go out of its way to make a law that bans them?

It’s a lack of empathy and understanding toward transgender people. Williams said it best – those making this law have an “irrational fear of a minority population.”

The ACLU of Utah has ways you can help stop this bill, like lobbying to your senator, on its website.

OPINION | Glow Up culture just another consumerist trick

Glow Ups take the worst parts of diet culture, youth culture and consumerism and smash them all together to make a toxic monster that haunts our dreams at night.

Urban Dictionary defines a “Glow Up” as “a mental, physical, and an emotional transformation for the better. Glow Ups can be both natural or planned. As well as being gradual and permanent, or fast and temporary.”

It’s a cool concept, but let’s get real; who posts photos on Instagram of their newfound emotional maturity? In a society with visual values, there’s an implicit understanding that Glow Ups always have a visual component to them.

I should clarify that there’s a difference between putting work into yourself to make healthier life decisions versus throwing yourself into all the new beauty trends and comparing yourself to how models look.

There are infinite ways to Glow Up, although the vast majority of people who have them — or at least post about them on social media — are women who change their appearance. The internet is obsessed with women looking thin but curvy, flawless but natural, and sexy but innocent. It’s no wonder that this trend is blowing up right now; nothing is ever enough, is it?

While beauty standards affect men, women and everyone in between, women who are perceived as unattractive make less money than their attractive counterparts. It affects everyone mentally, but disproportionately affects women financially.

Beauty advertisements also target women much more often and they’ve been doing it for decades. Old cartoons that depict women before and after using X products are just the 1950s version of modern day influencers peddling skin creams for acne and anti-cellulite leggings.

What is up with the internet’s obsession with making drastic and immediate visual changes to women’s bodies? I, for one, wish Instagram models would shut up about how easy it is to get a snatched waist if you just buy this detox tea and follow this simple exercise routine.

We all know that “detox tea” just means “laxative” anyway, so why are we still buying into it? Furthermore, why are we still buying it?

When it comes to profiting off insecurity, the beauty and diet industries are really raking it in. Think about it; the entities that benefit the most from our insecurities are the ones that sell the “solutions.”

Do you feel marginalized and ignored by society because you don’t perfectly fit the current beauty standards? Buy these items and purchase this program and soon you’ll look completely different. You wouldn’t want to get caught looking like — gasp — yourself!

There’s so much more to Glow Up culture than the damage it does to impressionable youth who don’t have fully formed self-concepts yet. Of course you weren’t “sexy” when you were in middle school — you were a child. So what’s the deal with the folks posting pictures of their 13-year-old selves and saying, “Thank God I don’t look like that anymore!”

I get that Glow Up is a play on “grow up,” but this whole ugly duckling mentality crumbles under actual analysis.

We all remember that story, right? The one that teaches children that it’s OK to be ugly as long as you grow up to be beautiful? The Ugly Duckling was really the original Glow Up when you think about it.

The tough truth is that we’re not all going to end up as swans. Moreover, waterfowl aren’t bombarded with ads about how to make their feathers softer or quick and easy beak procedures.

“Glow Up culture is a capitalist plague that feeds off our insecurities and you can’t convince me otherwise. Don’t buy into it.”

Emily Mildenhall

I struggled with eating disorders for years. Teachers and classmates who knew me in middle school complimented me in high school after my weight loss. As a teenager, I learned that my peers didn’t see me as a human being until after my Glow Up.

Being thinner and more focused on fitting the acceptable look only made the pressure to be pretty worse; my obsession with my body made me scrutinize other things like the thinness of my eyebrows, the lack of volume in my hair, the shape of my nose… It’s a chain reaction that can go on forever if left untreated.

I’m done giving money to industries that count on my self-doubt to make a profit and I’m encouraging everyone to do the same. The most punk rock thing we as women can do is place sisterhood before the male gaze and end this toxic trend.

Glow Up culture is a capitalist plague that feeds off our insecurities and you can’t convince me otherwise. Don’t buy into it.

Just because it has a cute name doesn’t mean it’s harmless.

OPINION | All Americans should embrace Black History Month

Those who are getting angry over giving those who have been historically enslaved, defamed and tortured over the amount of melanin in their skin a month to share their history American history share the same sentiment as KKK members.

We see history repeat itself time and time again in terms of when the KKK is strongest in numbers. It started with the 1915 film “The Birth of a Nation,” which sparked Black hate across the country, then membership dwindled. KKK crimes rose once more during the Civil Rights Movement, in what was seen as a direct response to those fighting to end Jim Crow segregation laws. Ever since, the KKK has kept up with trying to spread its hateful ideology like a four-year-old holding onto its favorite color crayon, except a four-year-old does not commit murder if someone says their color of crayon is not superior.

The importance of Black History Month is to highlight Black figures and their accomplishments to show that yes, Black Americans have contributed to society, they are educated, and they are successful. Why is it important for all Americans to celebrate and know this? Because we do not teach Black history and their contributions or atrocities committed against them in our educational curriculum.

Jane Elliot, educator and diversity trainer, said: “Any white person who was born, raised, and schooled in the United States of America if you are not a racist, you’re a miracle. Either that or you decided to educate yourself, because education in this country is about white is right, brown’s alright, black has to stand back.”

Black History Month was officially recognized in 1976 by then-President Gerald Ford to “seize the opportunity to honor the too-often neglected accomplishments of Black Americans in every area of endeavor throughout our history.”

Every U.S. president since then has regarded February as the designated Black History Month we know today.

Now begs the question you want to hear answered: Why do people who disapprove of Black History Month share the same sentiment as the KKK?

For the KKK, any attempt to debunk their idea of white supremacy is seen as a threat. Showing Black American accomplishments is a threat to the KKK because acknowledging all the things that Black Americans have done in the U.S. directly contradicts what they believe.

In the summer of 2020, the Black Lives Matter movement gained traction over the death of George Floyd. Those who chose to oppose the movement mostly extremist Republicans by saying “all lives matter” or “blue lives matter” are the same majority who voted for former President Donald Trump. Those individuals have the same mindset of those who go on to request their kids be opted-out of the Black History month curriculum. The director of the school who allowed this said he wanted to let parents exercise their civil liberties, then later reversed the decision.

Many aspects of the Republican ideology mirror that of the KKK. Both value traditional, Christian, conservative views. Both are anti-immigration, tend to be more homophobic and transphobic than Democrats, have an issue with Black History Month, and voted for President Trump, who has embraced the Proud Boys and has failed to condemn white supremacists, in the 2020 election.

A majority of Republicans wish to assure that there are no ties between their party and racism, and plenty of them say, “Democrats founded the KKK,” but the Democratic Party did not. The overwhelming support for Democrats before the ‘60s from racist white supremacists stemmed from the Jim Crow laws put in place at the time. During the ‘60s, the change in political demographic with the Civil Rights Movement led the Republican Party to begin catering to white supremacists as the Republican ideology changed. David Duke is a prime example, as he is an active member of the Republican Party and former grand wizard of the KKK.

Some of you will say “not all Republicans hate Black History Month,” and while each individual has their own thoughts, the Republican Party has now historically shown ties to the KKK. Remember the incident at Capitol Hill when Trump’s Republicans stormed the building waving white supremacist flags?

You should not be angry over a 45-year tradition celebrating Black accomplishments when most of U.S. history has contributed to nearly 400 years of Black Americans’ enslavement and oppression. Instead, learn from from Black History Month and embrace it.

Men’s basketball splits series with Tarleton State University

The first all-time series meeting between Dixie State University’s men’s basketball team and Tarleton State University results in a split.

The Texans took game one against the Trailblazers by a final 59-77 scoreline Feb. 19, and DSU came away with the victory in game two with the score being 64-48 Feb. 20.

Here are some key takeaways from this battle of Division I newcomers in the Western Athletic Conference:

Maintaining momentum

This two-game series was identified by who would maintain momentum the longest to win the game. In game one, TSU had all the momentum right from the jump by having its largest lead being 20 points. DSU cut down the Texans’ lead to ten points at two different points in the game; however, TSU had the hot hand throughout the night by knocking down 50% of its shots from the court.

Head coach Jon Judkins said he showed his team on film how wide open they were on certain plays, and he wants his players to shoot the ball with confidence because the Texans were going to stick with their game plan by stopping the Trailblazers’ big men in the paint.

Judkins said: “I heard some of [my players] talking about their confidence, and we tell them: ‘Hey guys we have all the confidence in the world. If you’re open, shoot it. If you’re in your range and you’re a three-point shooter, then shoot it.’”

Then DSU flipped the script in game two by shifting the momentum in their favor. Throughout the first half, the Trailblazers and TSU would exchange baskets, but guard Andre Mulibea, a freshman general studies major from Salt Lake City, hit a huge three pointer as the first half expired to give DSU a huge swing of momentum. The Trailblazers capitalized on the momentum and ran with it to claim the victory over the Texans.

Mulibea said it felt amazing to hit that last-second three pointer to give his team momentum coming out of halftime, and his teammates kept trusting him to knock down shots.

Guard Isaiah Pope, a sophomore communication studies major from Yorba Linda, California, said the coaches and his teammates put a lot of emphasis on beating TSU because they were embarrassed and disappointed with the loss in game one, so they had a point to prove.

Defense

The Texans laid out a blueprint offensively where they would wind down the shot clock to the last ten seconds and knock down their shots. In game one, DSU would do it’s best to stay locked in defensively by staying man-to-man, two-three zone, or applying a full court trap and press defense.

Judkins said the Texans work the shot clock all the time, and the way he countered TSU’s strategy was by making sure his players stay in front of the guy with the ball and force difficult shots.

In game two, DSU’s defense improved significantly by forcing the Texans to commit shot clock violations, holding TSU’s offense to a 35% shooting percentage, and only allowing 17 points in the second half.

Judkins said the team’s defense made the difference in game two, and it’s the reason why his team won the game.

Knocking down the mid to long-range shots

In this two-game series, the Trailblazers offensively settled for the mid to long-range shots. The Trailblazers combined for 38 points in the paint from both games and combined for 85 points when shooting mid to long-range. Despite DSU’s 30% shooting percentage and 17% three-point percentage in game one, those numbers bumped up to 42% shooting from the court and 39% shooting from downtown.

Mulibea and Pope had a big night shooting from mid to long-range in game two. Pope had a new career high in points with 22 and tied the single game record for most three pointers made in the DSU’s men’s basketball programs’ history with six. Mulibea had 14 points while knocking down four of seven three-pointers.

Pope said he credits his teammates for doing an outstanding job finding the hot hand, whether it was him or Mulibea, and he thought the team overall played unselfishly by sharing the ball or making the extra pass to score points.

Making the extra pass for points

Making the extra pass to score points turned out to be more successful in game two for the Trailblazers compared to game one. DSU players would make the extra pass to one another to try to score points in game one, but it specifically worked in favor of forward Hunter Schofield, a senior exercise science major from Spanish Fork. Schofield scored 18 points in the second half in game one, which led to the Trailblazers’ main source of scoring.

Now in game two, since the Texans’ defense was focused in on Schofield, this allowed more ball movement outside the paint to allow points to be scored from mid to long-range.

Judkins said he saw on film how TSU collapsed down onto Schofield and there would be times when Schofield would be guarded by three or four defenders. Judkins continued saying Schofield did amazing in kicking the ball back out to his teammates to create scoring opportunities.

Bye week

After another series split, DSU improves to 8-11 overall and 4-8 in conference play. Since Chicago State University suspended its 2020-21 season and the game against Park University is canceled, the Trailblazers will have a bye week before they head out on the court again.

Pope and Mulibea agreed that this week off will help the team focus on themselves, get a mental break physically and mentally, and perfect who they are as a team.

Judkins said this bye week came at a good time because his team is worn out from playing a lot of minutes due to injuries and playing two consecutive games every week.

Judkins said: “We’re going to give [our team] Monday off. Tuesday is going to be like our Monday, and then we’ve got to have good practices on Wednesday, Thursday, Friday. We’ve got to get rest, but you can’t get rest and get rusty, but it’s time for these guys to get their rest and save their legs.”

DSU’s last two games of the season will be at home against New Mexico State University Mar. 5-6 at the Burns Arena.

DSU men’s soccer fall 2-1 to SJ State, get first goal of 2021 season

For Dixie State University’s men’s soccer team, its showing against San Jose State that resulted in a 2-1 loss was the tale of two halves.

DSU came out on the front foot in the first half, despite starting three freshmen and two sophomores, and played a clean first half. The team played a flat 4-4-2 for most of the half and defended strongly against a more experienced SJ State team.

“It’s nice to come out strong, and they did in [the games versus SJ State and Airforce],” head coach Johnny Broadhead said. “Today we were even able to get a goal.”

The Trailblazers’ lone goal came off the foot of captain Idris Alabi, a redshirt junior biology major from Vail, Arizona, in the 14th minute.

“It’s good to get that monkey off our back,” Alabi said. “We didn’t get any goals last game, so it felt good, but we wanted more.”

Headed into halftime, the Trailblazers lead 1-0, but the second half quickly got physical, and the Trailblazers found themselves struggling.

“In the second half, we wanted to try and press them because we knew they were going to try and press us, and for the most part, it worked,” said Matt Lockwood, a junior nursing major from West Jordan. “I really felt like some guys got fatigued today and it really showed in the last 15 minutes.”

The fatigue did show, as the game got more and more chippy as the 90 minutes wore on. Three Trailblazers would see yellow card cautions in this one: One to redshirt midfielder Niko Shumov, a junior marketing major from Keaau, Hawaii, in the 69th minute, one to Alabi in the 77th, and the final one to forward John Joseph, a sophomore design major from Richmond, British Columbia, in the 78th minute would be the most controversial of the night.

SJ State defender Eduardo Miranda and Joseph had been going back and forth most of the night; a shove in the back from Miranda following some verbal altercations led to both players being shown yellow. The game got even more physical from there.

Then, in the 79th minute, just seconds after the altercation, the Spartans would find a goal to draw the game level at 1-1. The Trailblazers’ defense couldn’t handle more pressure from the Spartans.

“Credit to San Jose,” Broadhead said. “They deserve the moments that they created; they had a lot of the ball.”

Once the Trailblazers’ defense broke, it would take just six minutes for SJ State’s Nicolas Brenes to find the winning goal in this one. SJ State was able to score two in the second half, while DSU failed to even register a shot on goal after the halftime break, a trend the team is starting to see.

Broadhead said this game against SJ State showed how the team seems to be taking things one step at a time. Against Air Force, the Trailblazers played a clean but scoreless first half, didn’t get a shot, and gave up goals. Against SJ State, they added in a goal but still could not stay focused in the second half.

Lockwood said he recognizes that some of this comes with experience, but at the end of the day, he knows his team is strong and capable of doing more; it’s just a matter of time.

“We know it’s going to be a hard season,” Lockwood said. “We’re young and newcomers to the WAC, but [the team knows] you’re going to have to grow up fast if you chose to come [to DSU].”

DSU men’s soccer faces Incarnate Word Feb. 27 for its next Western Athletic Conference matchup.