UTAH TECH UNIVERSITY'S STUDENT NEWS SOURCE | October 03, 2025

Lawsuit against Utah Tech administrators—Title IX breaches

Title IX is a federal law that protects faculty, staff and students from discrimination, sexual and non-sexual harassment and retaliation.

The specific details of this law change depending on the university, and each university may have a different statement surrounding Title IX. Utah Tech University specifically states that the university is committed to maintaining a safe environment where everyone in the community is treated with respect and dignity.

What happens when a law designed to protect those in an educational setting repeatedly fails?

On Nov. 9, ABC4 News released a 42-page lawsuit that named administrative faculty and staff members at Utah Tech. The lawsuit stems from a series of Title IX breaches, but the final straw for the plaintiffs was a “gag gift” sent from former president Richard “Biff” Williams.

The Salt Lake Tribune reported that this gift included two homegrown eggplants and Williams’ record-breaking zucchini placed strategically to represent a phallus. Williams did not sign his own name on the gift. Instead, he signed the gift—without their consent—from three employees:

  • Rebecca “Becky” Broadbent, general counsel
  • Jared Rasband, senior associate general counsel
  • Hazel Sainsbury, director of equity compliance and Title IX coordinator

Many of the incidents outlined in the lawsuit include inappropriate signage on the walls of an office, racially charged jokes and retaliation for reporting these incidents to Title IX.

The Salt Lake Tribune met with the three plaintiffs, Broadbent, Rasband and Sainsbury, which is the first time the three spoke to a news source about their lawsuit against Utah Tech.

As the Title IX director, Sainsbury told The Tribune the gift had completely undermined everything she does at Utah Tech.

Sainsbury said: “What kind of victim is going to approach my office if they believe that I participate in these types of vulgar jokes? How would a victim feel [confident] in my work?”

Reporting cases of harassment is protected under this federal law, meaning they should not face retaliation for reporting breaches of Title IX.

However, after filing the lawsuit, Broadbent was placed on leave and has been away from her office for nine months, forced to turn in her laptop and key cards. The university still has not made a statement about Broadbent.

Rasband told The Tribune he had to watch Broadbent get escorted off campus by two human resources officials with only a five minute notice of her suspension.

“She’s sitting there in tears, completely shocked and taken aback,” Rasband said.

In the article, Broadbent said during her leave, no one at the university checked on her, which has proven to be a very difficult time period.

“There’s a heavy burden for any complainant that brings forward concerns that they feel they have been subjected to misconduct,” Broadbent said.

Meanwhile, Williams, who is a defendant in the report, stepped down from his position at Utah Tech in January. After stepping down, Williams was able to live in the presidential home rent-free for six months, as stated in the lawsuit, and was paid from Utah Tech until he obtained his position at Missouri State University.

The lawsuit reports that Broadbent spoke to Williams about her concerns; however, he was dismissive and attempted to manipulate and silence her about her concerns, assuring her she was “loved and part of the family.”

Sainsbury told The Tribune she was subjected to racist jokes by administrators because “the institution was not prepared for someone like me to do the work so effectively… They’ve attributed malice to my work and compared me to a previous Black administrator that they found to be problematic.”

The Utah System of Higher Education is also named in the lawsuit. This is because after the three plaintiffs reported their concerns, USHE intentionally avoided the policies, processes and timelines that should have been afforded to the plaintiffs as employees of public institutions of higher education.

Broadbent told The Tribune, “They [USHE] need to stop covering up bad behavior, stop paying off bad actors and start owning up to the need to provide proper oversight of presidents and their administrators.”

Jordon Sharp, Julie Chew, Tasha Toy, Travis Rosenberg, Tiffany Wilson and Henrie Walton declined to interview with Sun News Daily about the incidents of the lawsuit.

The 42-page report states that Sharp and other team members of the University Marketing and Communications department shared a group chat, replying to the “gag gift.”

Jyl Hall, director of public relations and defendant in the lawsuit, said in a statement that UMAC is aware of the complaint filed against Utah Tech and is committed to working with all parties to reach a resolution.

Part of the statement said: “The University takes all allegations seriously. We have been actively following established university procedures to thoroughly review any concerns brought to the University’s attention, including hiring neutral third-party professionals to evaluate these complaints, and are taking necessary steps as appropriate.”

Nearly a week after ABC4 News released the 42-page lawsuit document, Courtney White, Utah Tech interim president, addressed faculty and staff:

This email was sent specifically to faculty and staff at the university, meaning students not working for Utah Tech still have not received a statement, which made some students discouraged by the consistent lack of integrity of the university faculty.

Savanna Romero, a senior English major from St. George, said, “It’s kinda sad to me that we deal with this as students, but the issues are a byproduct of immaturity because our highest faculty also don’t know how to act appropriately.”

The lack of accountability is a recurring issue the plaintiffs face. The Tribune reported that the three plaintiffs never pictured themselves in this situation, nor did they want to file the lawsuit.

“There just needs to be accountability,” Sainsbury said. “That’s what’s been missing out of this whole thing… We have great people at Utah Tech who have devoted themselves to our students, and they deserve a productive, safe place to work.”

The Utah Tech chapter of the American Federation of Teachers responded to this lawsuit Nov. 13.

The press release states the AFT “strongly condemns all such practices and actions by individuals or governing bodies, past, present and future… Any individual, regardless of position in the university or its governing bodies, who is proven to engage in a pattern of discriminatory, unethical, or illegal actions or who engages in continued behaviors that create a toxic, unsafe, and hostile environment—including retaliatory actions—is unfit to work at or on behalf of Utah Tech University.”

James Stein, associate professor of communications, is not connected to the lawsuit but wanted to voice his frustrations. He stated faculty was never informed of this incident, despite asking repeatedly what happened when Williams stepped down, as well as when Micheal Lacourse, provost and vice president of student affairs, was placed on leave.

The reason why Lacourse was placed on leave is still unknown, though it is said in the lawsuit he was verbally abusive to Sainsbury. In one meeting, Lacourse allegedly, “pointed a finger at Sainsbury and aggressively slammed his fist on the table, demanding to know ‘who do you think you are!'”

Stein said he was simply angry that this was happening, and believed he had an obligation to speak out for those who could not.

“As a person with ‘power’ in this university, it is my obligation to do more than just pretend none of this is happening because that is how we got here in the first place,” Stein said.

A month after Williams stepped down, White was named the interim president, and Stein said this should have been a more comprehensive search because of the pattern of behavior shown by the current administration.

“When we were looking for an interim president, we just went, ‘Who’s available?’ and it turned out to be somebody who is also named in the lawsuit,” Stein said. “Instead of doing a comprehensive search and unpacking why the president stepped down, and who would be a better fit to replace them, don’t you think maybe, perhaps, if we have this pattern of men engaging in inappropriate behavior, then we need a more diverse perspective on leadership?”

He said that the university needs to look elsewhere for the next president and the pattern of inappropriate behavior proves that.

“If the men in this community have proven that they are incapable of leading, then maybe its time for women to lead, for people who aren’t from this town to lead,” Stein said.

Rasband said the new president needs to be somebody with moral courage who will not be afraid to hold people accountable if their behavior does not meet expectations.

Broadbent said it needs to be someone who “is not part of the existing boys club [and will] hold people accountable to the values and the policies the university espouses, so when we recruit in students and employees it’s not a facade.”

A court date has not been released to the public. Title IX is a federal law that protects everyone from situations like these, and students can still report if they are being discriminated against or harassed.

SunTran route makes getting to Zion easier, fuel efficient

Visitors to Zion National Park now have a new, budget-friendly travel option. SunTran has launched a 42-mile route connecting St. George to Zion on Nov. 1. The route includes stops in Washington, Hurricane, La Verkin, Virgin and Springdale. The new service aims to reduce traffic congestion and cut down gas and parking costs. 

With daily operating hours from 5:40 a.m. – 8:30 p.m., the service makes it easy for locals and tourists to hop on a bus and make the trip to Zion stress free. Instead of navigating the busy roads or dealing with Zion’s limited parking, visitors can enjoy a relaxing journey straight to the park.

Megan Willie, public relations and communications intern with the city of St. George, said: “The city of St. George saw this route as a way to support both locals and the millions of visitors coming to Zion every year. The main goals are to reduce traffic congestion, make travel more sustainable and ensure that Zion is accessible to more residents, especially those who don’t have personal transportation.”

The route is also set to reduce the number of cars on the road in Springdale, easing traffic congestion in this gateway town. Fewer cars mean fewer traffic jams and a more pleasant experience for visitors and residents. The town of Springdale also has a significant amount of employees who live in St. George and Washington and can now take advantage of the new transit option for their commute. 

Barbara Bruno, Springdale’s Mayor, said: “Our average age is pretty advanced. And so a lot of people don’t drive anymore or don’t want to drive. So it’s really going to have a positive impact. I know at least one elderly woman who has been using it since it started, and she said she’s a lot more relaxed, and she’s just thrilled about it.” 

Springdale residents have expressed frustration over rising traffic and limited open space. This steady influx of tourists contributes to congestion and noise, highlighting the town’s struggle to balance its charm with the quality of life for locals.

The town’s 2022 General Plan said: “Despite the Town’s efforts to create a comprehensive transportation system, the Town experiences periods of traffic and parking congestion during peak visitation to Zion National Park. In 2018, the Town instituted a paid on-street parking program. This has helped manage and organize visitor parking and has reduced many of the negative impacts of visitor parking congestion. However, during peak periods parking demand exceeds capacity and parking congestion problems continue in the community.”

By introducing this route, SunTran has taken a significant step toward sustainable tourism at Zion National Park. With fewer cars on the road and more visitors choosing public transit, SunTran’s new route helps to preserve Zion’s natural landscape while providing a wallet friendly option for reaching the park. Fewer cars on the road mean reduced emissions, supporting Zion National Park’s mission to protect its natural environment. 

The route is funded to operate for the next 10 years. To gauge its effectiveness, the city plans to monitor several key factors. Rider usage will be closely tracked to understand overall demand and how the demand changes during different times of the year. The city will also analyze which stops are successful. This could lead to certain stops being eliminated and stops being added where needed.

David Cordero, communications and marketing director for the city of St. George, said: “The greatest success would be full buses and a public clamor for more times. I think being realistic, we want people to use it, and our hope is that it’ll slowly increase over time as people find out about it and see how easy it is.” 

With SunTran’s new route in place, going to Zion National Park is now simpler, more affordable and eco-friendly for everyone. Whether it’s residents commuting to work or tourists exploring Zion, the new service marks an important shift toward convenient and responsible tourism in southern Utah.

Bills, Rights & Bites: St. George Chamber of Commerce event offered election debrief, county collaboration

To discuss the 2024 election from both political sides, the St. George Chamber of Commerce focused their monthly Bills, Rights & Bites event—hosted by Intermountain Health Care—on the election results.

The panel included Sherry Nicholes from the Democratic Party standing in for chair Chuck Goode, and Lesa Sandberg, chair of the Republican Party in Washington County. Henrie Walton, the Chamber of Commerce’s public policy committee chair, mediated the event.

The event had around 30 people in attendance. Most seemed to know each other, chatting before the event officially started at noon. Lunch was provided by Intermountain Healthcare, so the audience members could eat while they listened to the panel.

The panel took the form of a discussion, so there was no debate happening. The representatives did not share the same opinion on everything, but they both expressed the importance of collaboration.

The result of the 2024 election was a surprise to both Nicholes and Sandberg. For Nicholes, it was a disappointing surprise, but Sandberg was delighted her candidate won.

“I was delightfully surprised and even more surprised and delighted that it was such a big win. That not only did we get the electoral votes, but we also got the popular vote which we haven’t had in 20 years,” Sandberg said.

The Republican party hasn’t won the popular vote since George W. Bush in 2004. This is a win former president Donald Trump did not receive when he ran against Hilary Clinton in 2016.

“Even though the margin is pretty small, it’s still a pretty big shift compared to what we have seen in previous elections,” Geoff Allen, assistant professor of political science at Utah Tech University, said. “Republicans, when they win, it’s because they have a slight advantage in the Electoral College, but a slight disadvantage with the popular vote.”

Another surprise in the 2024 election was the fact that Trump won the electoral votes for all seven swing states.

“That has only happened a few times in recent memories, where every swing state goes toward one candidate. It’s pretty uncommon,” Allen said.

Both parties campaigned differently in the messages they shared and the ways they got their message out to voters.

“I don’t know that the Democratic candidate, that all the Democrats were behind her. It was a whirlwind kind of nomination—and unexpected nomination. And I think there were Democrats that stayed home frustrated, which helps in our win,” Sandberg said.

Kamala Harris entered the race late after President Joe Biden dropped out July 21. This delay hurt her chances of winning.

Trump campaigned on a message of boosting the economy and stopping illegal immigration. Many Americans are very concerned about the economy.

Allen said, “Democrats were not that successful across the whole country in telling their story about the economy, which that story is supported by our economic indicators is that the economy for the last 18 months has been pretty good… We have had really low unemployment rates. We have had pretty low inflation numbers today and we have pretty good and robust growth numbers, but that message did not get through to a lot of voters.”

Concerns were raised about how collaboration between parties will work with the Republican Party having power over the U.S. presidency, Senate and House of Representatives.

“I think it’s going to depend a lot on the majority. We all saw what happened in the last four years, with all the fighting all the time, not getting much accomplished. If we’re willing to talk to each other, I think we should be more collaborative. Compromise is not a dirty word… I hope that we will be able to work together,” Nicholes said.

Sandberg was a lot less optimistic about collaboration happening on the national level.

“I’d love to see collaboration. Realistically, I don’t see much of it happening. We haven’t seen it for how many years. It’s not just this last four, the four before that or the four before that. Our country’s been very polarized,” Sandberg said.

However, on a county level, there has been a lot of collaboration between parties. Goode and Sandberg work to collaborate on issues in the community. Nicholes mentioned Goode’s idea that a good idea is a good idea no matter where it came from—a Republican or a Democrat.

The panel also discussed the election of Governor Spencer Cox and the write-in candidate of Phil Lyman.

“I understand that Utah, on the surface, is a Republican state, but we need people to represent both sides and when you have the Senate and the House and they pass everything and the Governor rubber stamps it, that’s not good for us,” Nicholes said. “And I feel like that’s what Governor Cox has turned out to be even though he said he was going to be different.”

Nicholes was very supportive of Lyman as a write-in candidate because she hoped it would split the votes, Cox would not be elected and as she said, “we’d have a little bit of common sense in our state representatives.”

Sandberg was against the write-in because it stole votes from Cox, but overall, she got the outcome she was hoping for.

The attendees left with a greater understanding of the events of the 2024 election and an understanding of who is involved in the governing of this area. There was also a main message of respect for people of other political views and understanding that collaboration is possible between the two groups without resulting to insults and contention.

New Utah Tech event, Mic Drop, encourages students to share talents

The microphone was open to all, waiting on stage for singers, musicians and comedians to take their turn in the spotlight. The performers looked out on a dimly lit room covered in lanterns of all shapes and sizes, with people spread out on couches clapping along to music or laughing at jokes.

This event, hosted Nov. 13, is Mic Drop. Mic Drop is new to the Utah Tech University campus, taking inspiration from an annual Open Mic Night at Utah State University, and they lit the area with lanterns like a past event at Utah Tech called the Festival of Lamps.

“It allows students to sign up and have their voices be heard. They’re able to come up and they’re able to sing, they’re able to do their own comedy,” Asher Anderson, a senior marketing major from Mesa, Arizona, and director of live events for Utah Tech Student Association, said.

There are several events that involve live performances, but they are more limited than this event. Coffee and Comedy was hosted recently, but they hired professionally and Live and Local allows student bands to perform, but spots are limited. This event has more spots and opportunities for students to perform where they otherwise couldn’t.

There were 14 people who performed at the event ranging from comedians to musical performances. Each was more different than the last. The event started with an almost full audience, but the crowd slowly got smaller as the performances went on until there were about 20 people left.

“I just really love open mic events, and I just love singing,” Sydney McClellan, a sophomore graphic design major from Salt Lake City, said. “And so, when an event like this comes around, I always try to work up the courage to come to this.”

McClellan was one of the performers for the event. She played the piano and sang “Stay” by Rihanna, “Jealous” by Labrinth and one of her own songs.

There were also members of the community present both on and off stage. One person who performed is an 85-year-old institute teacher, Ava Fry. She teaches a class called “How to Become a Clean Stand-up Comedian,” and said she performed her stand-up act at the request of her students.

The set-up of the event was comfortable with couches set up down the center of the Gardner Ballroom and lamps contributing to dim lighting. There was also popcorn and lemonade served, so people could snack while they watched the performers.

“I thought it was very well set up,” Sarah Witt, a junior media studies major from Heber City, said. “They had a very distinct vibe in here and it made it really, really fun. Honestly, it was probably one of my new favorite events.”

The audience was very supportive of the performers on stage, especially when they struggled with the words or tune. They would cheer louder to support those nervous performers, and the performers were able to get through their songs easier than if the crowd had stayed silent.

“I think that supporting local and small arts like this is especially important for college students because so many kids are moving out here without an outlet to do that,” David Garrett, manager at Mary’s Cheesecakes in St. George, said. Garrett heard about the event through social media and has enjoyed coming to activities that involve live music.

Anderson said this event might continue next year, depending on student response, to allow even more students the opportunity to showcase their talents and potentially become a new Utah Tech tradition.

Utah Tech’s Testing Center: anxiety, concerns, future improvements

By: Sam New

The Utah Tech University Testing Center, with its constantly changing hours, center structure and anxious environments, has made many students voice their concerns about the conditions and overall necessity of the Testing Center on campus.

With final exams starting Dec. 9, and the recent changes of the Testing Center hours to noon – 10 p.m., students have voiced complaints about the operation of the Testing Center and changes they’d like to see.

Grace Bolinder, a junior digital design major from Centerville, said she has had mostly negative experiences at the Testing Center. Although it’s not entirely their fault, the environment of the Testing Center makes testing overall a worse experience.

“It’s one of the most toxic testing environments I’ve ever been in,” Bolinder said. “Everyone’s stressed out and grumpy, and it makes me stressed out and grumpy.”

Bolinder said the long lines during finals week, working around schedules and the setup of computers are a few factors that lead to stress.

“Every student on campus has to go to one building with, like, what, 50 to 60 computers to take their tests?” Bolinder said. “That ratio does not make sense, right?”

When asked about the hours of operation at the Testing Center, she said she had concerns about the lack of open hours in the morning. This semester, the Testing Center discontinued its morning appointments with its new opening hours as of Aug. 2024 and final tests handed out at 9 p.m. She said many other building hours on campus fall into the 9 a.m. – 5 p.m. schedule, but the Testing Center does not.

“I work. I do a lot of other things, so having to plan time to go in the afternoon and nighttime is sometimes difficult,” Bolinder said.

With finals at Utah Tech having times blocked out for exams, Bolinder said she doesn’t understand why professors don’t have all of their finals during those allocated times.

“They all have a set aside time for us to take a final,” Bolinder said. “Why do all professors send us to the Testing Center when we could all bring our laptops and take them to the classroom during finals time?”

Avril Kester, a senior marketing and management major from Los Angeles, said the Testing Center, and testing in general, brings her high levels of anxiety. The high number of cameras, waiting in line and the number of people were a few factors that added to her anxiety.

“There’s always someone walking around, there’s people by you and you get your score while you’re in front of a bunch of other people,” Kester said. “It’s just intimidating.”

She said although she’s had mostly positive experiences with the Testing Center itself, she prefers testing at home, where it’s less intimidating. Kester said she prefers options such as Proctorio, which became popular in education after the COVID-19 pandemic.

“I don’t think it’s needed so much anymore,” Kester said. “I’ve been here for three years, and I’ve used it maybe for two classes.”

Dr. Tamron Lee, director of the Testing Center, has been working with concerns about the Testing Center since taking the position. Testing Center hours, unattended phones and anxiety in the Testing Center are all concerns that have been brought up by students.

“Being blunt, it’s a funding issue,” Lee said.

The institutional funding received for the Testing Center doesn’t cover the costs of operation due to wage inflation, the reduction of operation hours, the inclusion of charging for tests in the professional Testing Center, and the high reliance on work study for part-time staff.

“Before the cut, we were… open more hours than any other school in the western United States,” Lee said. “I would love to get back to that as soon as we can.”

When it comes to resources for students who struggle with testing anxiety, Lee said that the Disability Resource Center at Utah Tech offers accommodations such as private testing rooms to those in need and the Testing Center offers private testing rooms for when the DRC is closed.

Although Lee has purchased more computers for the center, he said that given enough funding, there are more changes that he would make.

“I would replace some of the desks with computers, I would increase the level of staffing and I would pay our proctor more,” Lee said. “That’s what we’ve been pushing for.”

OPINION | Don’t let politics create division

“I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America
and to the Republic for which it stands, one Nation,
under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all.”

As a child, I would stand for the flag and repeat those words alongside my classmates. And that was one of the few times I consistently felt united with my peers. As we have become adults, it feels like we have forgotten the importance of uniting as “one Nation,” especially after this past election.

I respect the opinions of both the Republican and Democratic sides of the political viewpoints; however, I disagree with the negative treatment toward each other after the election. This includes shunning the other party for who they voted for, unfollowing people or being flat-out rude.

All of this negativity led to me taking a social media cleanse just to escape the cloud of toxicity and hatred floating around the internet. I understand being upset when a certain party is elected that you were not aiming for, but this should not be a driving factor to further divide our nation.

The day following the election, my social media feed consisted of people from both parties posting political statements. Usually, this does not faze me. Yet, this time, the political posts were not just statements of support but harsh and rude towards the other party. I was shocked. I do not remember such an extreme reaction to the previous elections. I understand a lot was on the line depending on who won the votes, but emotions spiked to new levels.

Additionally, let’s not allow social media to control our emotions. Don’t believe everything that you see online, research it first. When you are researching, also take into consideration that there are extremists in both political parties, and the mainstream media loves to highlight these extreme points. When this is done, form your own opinions and emotions. Then, it is OK to have those intense emotions and reactions.

Most importantly, it’s OK to have differing viewpoints. To provide an example, let’s not talk about politics for a second. I, personally, absolutely hate seafood. The smell itself sends me into a fight-or-flight response. Regardless, I do not hate people or shame them when they tell me they love seafood. Now, I know this is a minimal consequence scenario, but why can’t the same aspect apply to other things in life?

Very rarely in life will you 100% have the exact same opinion or view on a topic as someone else. And once again, that’s OK. Personally, I love hearing a diverse set of opinions from my own because it helps me expand my knowledge and empathize with others. Every single person has gone through a different set of challenges in life that help shape their opinions, meaning we should not belittle other’s opinions.

If you don’t agree with someone, nod your head or swipe past the post and continue on. It does not have to lead to a negative result. And, hot take, it should DEFINITELY not be the deciding factor of whether you are friends with a person or not. At the end of the day, this negativity will not solve anything.

Kamala Harris, during her concession speech, said: “A fundamental principle of American democracy is that when we lose an election, we accept the results. That principle, as much as any other, distinguishes democracy from monarchy and tyranny, and anyone who seeks the public trust must honor it.”

With all of this in mind, let’s not allow whom you voted for to stand in the way of taking action toward some of the world’s issues. Instead of spreading hate, let’s promote change.

Make a difference in the local ways that you can like attend city council meetings, join a commission or union, and volunteer. Part of this includes voting on a local level, which can impact a person just as much and is how most change is introduced into politics. Elections happen more frequently than the heavily advertised presidential elections. When you participate in these political activities, it ultimately will begin to bring our communities together.

Saying the other party is terrible for this reason or that does not solve the issue but further divides the two political parties. No change from either party is going to happen if we do not listen to the opinions of both sides. Be a voice that promotes change instead of hatred.

I know this is a time of confusion and fear with a new president and cabinet coming into office. However, hatred should not be added to this list of emotions. So, during this very divisive time, let’s not allow who you voted for to stand in the way of fixing the issues at hand. Let’s, instead, come together as one Nation and make a change.

OPINION | Hybrid online + in-person work = the future

While there are some possible drawbacks, a combination of on-location work combined with remote work allows employees to be more productive while also promoting a more balanced lifestyle. 

Since the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020 forced everyone to stay inside and out of the office, remote work has become a more available option to workers. A study by LinkedIn’s Global State of Remote and Hybrid Work study found that in April of 2022, the share of job postings that offered remote work reached 20.3%. This is a stark contrast to the 3% to 5% estimate before the pandemic. 

As employees have been moved out of the office and into their homes, moving workers to full-time remote work would be a mistake. A study by Stanford University in January found that fully remote workers are around 10% less productive than their other coworkers. Remote work can serve a purpose, but it should not be the standard for the future. 

Working completely remote has several drawbacks that cause it to be less productive than other methods. Communication is essential in nearly all jobs, and it takes a severe hit when everyone is remote.

Despite things such as video chats, they simply do not replace the benefits of meeting face to face. Online communication causes more distractions and confusion due to the inability to read things like body language and social cues. We also all learned during the pandemic when we were forced to do school or work completely online, technology isn’t always reliable and it was never quite the same as meeting in-person.

While I was in my senior year of high school during the pandemic, we were forced to go fully remote for the first portion of the year. While we were able to get some things done, it didn’t come close to the learning experience in the classroom. The same disconnect that many felt during the pandemic continues to exist for those who work fully remote, as it hinders communication and productivity.  

While working completely remote has been shown to lower productivity, there are benefits to a mix of both on-location and remote work for both employers and employees. The previously mentioned Stanford study also found that hybrid working had no significant impact on productivity and also helped employee recruitment and retention.

This gives workers greater flexibility, which many people became accustomed to during the pandemic, while also allowing them to remain as productive as if they were in an office every day. 

Hybrid work allows workers to live a healthier lifestyle as it creates a better balance between work and home life. Workers save time commuting from work on days they aren’t in the office, which allows them to spend more time with their families. It also helps build a stronger community between employees and their employers as they feel more connected and retain flexibility, while also building relationships with their colleagues.

This also promotes a healthier work environment as a hybrid work method makes workers happier to be a part of their respective companies and reduces negative work relationships. When negative relationships do come up, the hybrid method also allows workers to work through it during their time at home. 

The hybrid approach simply allows workers and employers to find the middle ground between productivity, a healthy lifestyle and flexibility. It also reduces the drawbacks that come from both fully remote and on-location work, such as productivity and a balance between work and the rest of life. 

From scholarships to study rooms: Booth Honors Program creates engaging learning experience

The Booth Honors Program at Utah Tech University is a program for students who go above and beyond academically. The program provides students with a curriculum that is engaging, along with a community of peers, faculty and staff who share similar interests.

Some of the perks students in the program get include priority registration, scholarship opportunities, small class sizes, a dedicated study room and even honors housing. The dedicated space, The Booth, is located on the 4th floor of the Jeffrey R. Holland Centennial Commons & Library building on campus. Students utilize the quiet room to be productive and focus on their work. They also have access to free printing, which is a perk in itself. 

Kei Hale, a senior individualized studies major from Layton, said: “I have used [The Booth] for hours of studying and homework, as I find that the mindset of being in there is completely different. I am able to focus a lot more, and my productivity seems to skyrocket.”

Honors courses are more discussion-based than regular courses; they focus on collaborative experiences that make students think outside of their majors. The small class sizes allow students to form a bond with their classmates and professors.

While a few of the classes are the typical class size, most are capped at five students. However, honors courses are open to all students, even if they aren’t enrolled in the honors program. There are a handful of seminars listed every semester with topics like Bioethics, Embodiment and Technology and Multicultural Literature.

In one of the courses being taught this semester by John Wolfe, associate professor of philosophy and humanities and philosophy program director, Wolfe is bringing in former honors students to talk about how emerging technologies relate to their line of work. 

Wolfe said: “I had one [former student] come in who got a degree in psychology and was talking about the intersection between AI and psychology. I have another speaker come in and talk about the ethics of deepfakes and feminism in deepfakes. Another person talked about space travel and the work of setting up.” 

Wolfe said how these topics allow him and his students to have new conversations about things they’ve never really thought about before. The wide range of topics discussed in his class also gives his students insight into what role technology can play in their careers. This approach to learning reflects the Booth Honors Program’s commitment to encouraging students to think creatively and broaden their understanding of how knowledge applies to real world contexts.

There is no deadline to apply to the honors program, but to get priority registration, students must apply before March 16 at noon for fall semester or Nov. 1 for spring semester. To graduate from the honors program, students must be enrolled as full-time students here at Utah Tech, meet and maintain a grade point average of 3.25 or higher, and complete all of the honors coursework requirements. 

The program has not only helped students grow academically but also personally. Being part of a close-knit, driven community helps students develop leadership abilities and build a strong support network that can benefit them in the future.

Chasta Chamberlain, a junior English major from St. George, said: “I definitely feel like the program has helped me academically in the way that I am getting the education that I want and doing it at a pace that matches my own desires. Personally, I am fulfilling my strive for an academic challenge in the way that I get to take more upper-division classes and expand my learning through other topics.”

The Booth Honors Program is more than just an academic program. It’s a community that empowers students to reach their full potential. For those eager to push beyond the typical learning experience, the Booth Honors Program opens doors to personal growth, academic achievement and lasting connections.

OPINION | Why the election of Donald Trump means you’re complicit in an assault on women and equality

I never thought I would reach this point, but here I am. In the 2016 election, I had the naive hope the people who voted for Donald Trump were merely misled, desperate or too numb to the chaos that the 2016 election was.

I believed that there was some rational thought around why folks would vote for a man who called fallen soldiers “suckers” and “losers,”  to which Trump said, “For somebody to say the things that they say I said is a total lie. It’s fake news. It’s a disgrace.”

Or how he constantly attacked the news for “fake news” despite how thin that rationale was.

But this time, there are no excuses; we all know what he is capable of. Hello, Jan. 6th… and y’all just chose him to be president. A man who bragged about grabbing women without consent and dismisses and degrades the American people at every turn, especially if you are NOT a white, straight, Christian man.

Trump: a walking embodiment of misogyny

If you voted for Trump, disrespectfully, I do not want to hear any excuses from you. YOU CHOSE HIM. When you voted for Trump, it felt like you looked me right in the eyes and said, “You don’t matter.

You voted for a man who gloated about his treatment of women and how he uses them as props to boost his ego; he degrades us and belittles us.

He said, “Birdbrain doesn’t have the talent or temperament to do the job,” about Nikki Haley, a member of his party, because she dared to run against him in the primaries.

Yet, you still supported him.

He outlined how he and his goons are going to take away our autonomy, our safety and our right to exist without fear of harassment and assault. I mean, he already gloats about how he got Roe V. Wade overturned, and just a week after the election, I had a guy come up to me, slap my butt, and say, “Your body my choice,” which is a phrase coined by white supremacist and Trump supporter Nick Fuentes.

I’m done with the idea that I should be tolerant of people who support someone so openly hostile to women’s safety and dignity. You chose a man who sees women as objects, and by casting your vote for him, you chose to uphold that worldview.

Kamala Harris fights for women

We could have had Kamala Harris. A leader who fights for everyone right in front of you, and you STILL spit in the face of progress.

Instead your vote was for someone who said “I moved on her like a bitch” and has made it clear that he hates women. While we almost could have had someone who has spent her whole career fighting for women, she defended survivors of domestic violence, fought for reproductive freedom and worked for gender equality. You could have had a leader who believes in women’s right to choose, a LEADER who is representative of what women have been fighting for since 1848 with the start of Women’s Suffrage.

Instead, you rejected her. You rejected a candidate who deserves a seat at the table. When you chose Trump, you told women like me that I should stay in my lane, I should accept being silenced, I should just smile and endure. I refuse to respect anyone who thinks that not choosing Harris is an acceptable choice.

Your vote is an endorsement of racism

I feel horrified knowing that people in my life decided that racism was acceptable. You may claim you’re “not racist,” but when you voted for Trump, you chose to support a man who stokes hate, who emboldens white supremacy and who consistently targets Black, Brown and immigrant communities.

I feel the weight that your vote did. I look at my friends who aren’t white, who come from families that are immigrants, friends who had to fight for the basic respect in this country. Your vote told me their lives don’t matter. And if their lives don’t matter to you, I have to ask: why should I believe mine does?

I can’t believe we are here. Those people who I thought had some decency looked at Trump’s hate-fueled platform and went, “Yes, this is the president for me.” You voted for a false promise of a better economy and an outdated policy on immigration, which shows me that you have ZERO concepts of what goes into the economy and are racist.

I have nothing but contempt for you choosing “cheaper gas” over the most vulnerable people in our society. I don’t care how you frame it. I say this with complete disrespect: you are vile human beings for voting for Trump.

Kamala could have been the first Black and South Asian woman president

Harris is everything that Trump is not. Firstly, she is a Black and Asian woman—everything Trump’s America fears and despises. Harris represents a future in which not just white men can be in power.

Instead, the presidency could have represented the diversity that makes America great. We could have had a future where not only white voices are heard, but Black and Brown voices are heard, valued and celebrated.

Instead, you voted for hate and racism against every person who has fought to have a voice, be seen as a human and be respected in this country. You put some of my friends and godmothers at risk of backlash based on the color of their skin, and for that, I will never look at any of you the same.

You are complacent in bigotry

When you voted for Trump, you didn’t just vote for “different policies,” like ending birthright citizenship and reinstating his “Remain in Mexico,” rolling back Biden’s policy of expanding Title IX protections to transgender students, and ending gay marriages. You voted to uphold a worldview that says only certain people deserve respect, rights and opportunities. I’m furious knowing that people I care about chose bigotry over equality.

You may think that’s harsh, but I’m not mincing words—your vote told me everything I needed to know about what you truly value, and it’s clear that it doesn’t include the rights and safety of people who are different from you.

I’m exhausted from pretending that we can find common ground when you’ve made it clear that you don’t care about equality. You may not think you’re “against” women, people of color or the LGBTQ+ community, but when you chose to support Trump, you DID take a side. And it’s not a side that I can ever respect.

Harris could have protected rights for LGBTQ+ individuals

Harris has been a fierce advocate for people who are LGBTQ+ and maintaining their equality. She has fought for marriage equality, protections for transgender individuals and rights that everyone, regardless of your skin tone, nationality or how you identify.

She doesn’t say she supports these marginalized groups; she shows it through her actions, like attending a Washington D.C. Pride Parade.

You don’t get a pass anymore

If you’re reading this and feeling angry, good. Because I’m angry too. I’m angry that people I once respected—friends, family members, co-workers—chose to throw their weight behind a man who is the very embodiment of misogyny, racism and bigotry.

I’m angry that people are STILL making excuses for his vile behavior, for the harm he causes, for the future he’s going to take from us. We can expect war on women, immigrants, African Americans, Latinos and LGBTQ+ people, and that is a bleak future that I wish I could have avoided. Still, you decided these culture wars are more important than progress.

I’m done explaining to people why this feels personal—it is personal. This isn’t about “moving on” or “finding common ground”—it’s about justice and survival. If you don’t understand that, you’re part of the problem.

If you voted for Trump, you told me that my rights, my voice and my very humanity were not worth protecting. You don’t get to brush that off, and you don’t get to ask for my understanding. I’m not obligated to forgive people who see me as a lesser person, and I won’t pretend this was just another election. You made your choice, and now I’ve made mine.

Angel Wood Know I’m choosing motherhood my way, no delay

Question: How do you feel about motherhood?

Dear readers,

I’m a digital media major. What am I going to do with my degree? Be a mother. 

Here I am in college with three weeks left in my final semester and 30 days until my wedding. Truthfully, I entered college 2 ½ years ago without knowing exactly why. I knew that my biggest goal in life was to be a wife and a mother. In the meantime, college was my next best option, so here I am trucking along. 

But at the end of the day, when I’ve graduated and have my degree up my sleeve, I don’t want to be a news anchor. I don’t want to be a social media manager. I don’t want to be a journalist. I want to be a mom.

Was college all for nothing then? Of course not. I wouldn’t have traded my college experience for anything because I know I was meant to go for a reason. In some way, shape or form, I will use my degree one day whether it’s to educate others about what’s going on in the world, create a blog to share my own experiences or do social media and writing on the side, but that’s not what I want to do for the rest of my life.

Anyone who knows me knows this. 

What hurts about wanting to be a mom is not that it won’t happen for a while. What hurts is the people that tell me it shouldn’t happen. 

“Wait until a couple of years.” 

“Wait until you’ve settled down with your husband.” 

“Wait until you get your master’s degree.”

“Wait until you’ve traveled the world.”

“Wait until you have more money.”

“Wait until you’re actually ready.” 

“Wait. Wait. Wait.” 

I smile and nod as you tell me the things I’ve heard countless times already. As you walk away, I say thank you for your advice, but what I really want to say is this. 

If I waited for all these things, I’d never be ready. I’ll never be prepared enough. I’ll never be wealthy enough. I’ll never be knowledgeable enough. But there comes a point when you know in your heart that you are ready.

Every mother’s story is different, and just because some moms have regrets about getting pregnant too soon or doing this and that “wrong” doesn’t mean you have the right to tell me to wait. You don’t get to make me fear that I’ll have the same regrets as you. 

Your story is not my story.

You telling me to wait doesn’t make me doubt my ability to be a mom. It doesn’t make me think, “Oh, well, maybe I should wait.” It honestly just boils my blood. 

The main reason people tell me to wait is this.

“Angel, being a mom is so hard.”

Yes, I am aware of that. I have a mom. I’ve watched her for 20 years struggle, cry, mourn, sacrifice and push through every hardship with strength I can only hope to emulate. 

But I’ve also watched how happy she is fulfilling the one job she always wanted. When I ask her if there is anything she would have done differently, she always tells me she has no regrets. She says every challenge and sacrifice was worth it, and that the joy she feels now wouldn’t be the same without her kids. Her journey hasn’t been easy, but she’s shown me what it means to follow your heart and find fulfillment in what truly matters. 

It’s because of her that I want to be a mom, and when I tell her I want to be a mom, she doesn’t tell me to wait. She doesn’t make me doubt my dreams. She doesn’t make me feel like I can’t have what I want. She encourages me wholeheartedly, reminding me there’s no perfect time to pursue motherhood and that following my dreams is worth every challenge. 

To my mom, thank you for being the mom I hope to be like one day. 

To my future kids, I can’t wait to meet you.

To myself, when you are ready to be a mom, you will know it in your heart, and you will be the best mom you can be. 

To everyone else telling me to wait, thank you for your concern, but this is my dream, my heart and my journey. 

I’m not going to tell you to wait to be a doctor or a teacher or an entrepreneur. You’ll have plenty of waiting to do yourself. So don’t tell me not to follow my path just because it’s different from yours or doesn’t make sense to you.

I may not have it all figured out, but I have a vision for my life, one that includes raising a family and nurturing a future I have waited a lifetime for. So when the time comes, I’ll embrace it, ready or not, because I believe that some dreams are worth stepping into even before we feel completely prepared.

Sincerely, 

Angel Wood

If you are seeking advice on something, message me on Instagram at @angelwoodknow.